|
Case
Details of File Number: 34623/24/72/2013
|
|
Diary No: 141306
|
|
Name of the Complainant: LENIN
RAGHUVANSHI, SECRETARY GENERAL
|
|
Complainant Address: PEOPLES
VIGILANCE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS, SA 4/2 A, DAULATPUR,
|
|
Name of the Victim: RAMDHANI
MUSAHAR
|
|
Place of Incident: VARANASI
|
|
Date of Incident: 01/01/1991
|
|
Action Taken:
These proceedings shall be read in continuation with
earlier proceedings of the Commission. The matter rests thus. The case is
related to the death of the labourer Ramdhani Musahar district Varanasi at
Jaipur, Rajasthan. Case FIR No. 512/2013, PS: Badagaon Varanasi was
registered and after completion of investigation, the chargesheet dated
24/11/2013 was filed in the Court. The case is pending for want of the report
regarding the payment of financial assistance to the wife of the deceased
labourer namely Smt. Bhyam Payari Musahar. The Commission in its proceedings
dated 25/06/2018 had considered the matter and issued necessary directions to
the District Magistrate, Varanasi and to Senior Superintendent of Police,
Varanasi to take further necessary steps in this case. In response,
Additional District Magistrate, Administration, Varanasi has submitted his
report dated 29/06/2018. It is stated that an amount of Rs. 60,000/- has been
sanctioned by the District Social Welfare Officer, Varanasi under the
provisions of SC/SST POA Act to Smt. Bhyam Payari Musahar. The first
instalment of Rs.15,000/- has been transferred to her bank account on
24/06/2018 through e-payment. The Commission has perused the record placed
before it and considered the matter. It does appear that the investigation of
the case had been concluded by the police authorities and the financial
assistance under the relevant statutory provisions have been sanctioned to
the next of kin of the deceased person in the present case. No further action
is required at this stage in the case. Hence, this case is closed. LINK FILE
NO. 36046/24/72/2013.
|
|
Status : Action
Taken On 03/12/2018
|
|
Action Due Date: 03/12/2018
|
Thursday, May 23, 2019
Breaking culture of silence
Justice in the case of custodial death
|
Case
Details of File Number: 19039/24/22/2013-AD
|
|
Diary No: 79069/CR/2013
|
|
Name of the Complainant: DR.LENIN
RAGHUVANSHI, SECRETARY GENERAL
|
|
Complainant Address: PEOPLE
VIGILANCE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS, SA4/2 A, DAULAT PUR
|
|
Name of the Victim: BALVIR
|
|
Place of Incident: PS.AWAGARH
|
|
Date of Incident: 01/01/1991
|
|
Action Taken:
This case pertains to custodial death of UTP Balveer (25
years of age) on 17.5.2013 under the judicial custody of District Jail, Etah.
This case was registered on intimation from the District Jail, Etah, UP. A
case No. 18076/24/22/2013-AD was registered on the complaint of Secretary,
International Human Rights Nigrani Parisad, New Delhi and was linked to above
case. The complainant in this complaint has alleged torture by the police to
the deceased. It is also alleged that the Police Officer Shailender and one
Constable injected Petrol into the very sensitive parts of the body of the deceased
and he was also placed over hot Tawa. Another Cases No. 18072/24/22/2013-AD,
19386/24/22/2013-AD and 19039/24/22/2013-AD were also registered on the same
incident on the complaint of different NGOs. These cases were linked with the
Case No. 18034/24/22/2013-JCD. The Commission took cognizance on 27.5.2013 on
the incident. The Commission directed DM, Etah, SP, Etah and Superintendent,
District Jail, Etah, to submit requisite reports. Pursuant to the directions
of the Commission, the authorities have submitted a detailed report, Health
Screening Report, Inquest Report, Treatment Record, Post-Mortem Report and CD
of Post-Mortem and the Magisterial Enquiry Report. The detailed report dated
24.7.2013 submitted by the Superintendent, District Jail, Etah reveals that
the deceased Balveer Singh S/o Har Prasad was admitted to the Jail on
25.4.2013. The Health Screening at the time of admission to the Jail
indicated that besides multiple scabbed abrasion, burn injury were also seen
around his anus. The deceased was treated in the Jail Hospital; District
Hospital, Etah; SGPG Lucknow; and KGMC Lucknow, from 25.4.2013 to 17.5.2013,
for multiple scabbed abrasions of different size, pain and inflammation
around anus. He expired on 17.5.2013 while undergoing treatment. The Inquest
Report reveals blunt injury on chest. Blood oozing from nose and mouth; and
his right leg ankle had swelling. The Post-Mortem Report indicated no ante
mortem injury, clotted blood present on both nostrils and mouth. The cause of
death was opined to be, “Septicaemic shock due to chronic lung and kidney
disease”. The deceased died in GM & Associate Hospital, Lucknow on
17.5.2013 and the doctors of GMAH opined that the deceased Balveer died of,
“blunt injury chest, abdomen and wound in perineal region and cardio
respiratory failure”. The Video CD of Post-Mortem has also shown (a) a cut
mark injury on right cheek; (b) burn injury on the right knee; and (c) burn
injuries on both buttock and anal region. The report from SHO/Inspector K.K.
Mishra of PS Awagarh, District Etah dated 6.8.2017 reveals that the name of
the deceased Balveer and five others came to light in case vide Crime No.
102/13 u/s 306 IPC, PS Awagarh (during investigation Section 302/201/120-B
IPC were added to the case). He was arrested alongwith other accused on
24.4.2013. Balveer, died on 17.5.2013 during the treatment in the hospital.
Hence, Charge Sheet No. 164 has been filed before the Court on 20.11.2013
against the other accused. The police report further reveals that accused Balveer
S/o Har Prasad (deceased) was tortured by SI Shailender Kumar and Home Guard
Nirmal Kumar and one other. Consequently, a Case No. 129/13 u/s 326/331 IPC,
PS Awagarh was registered against the above named police officers on
16.5.2013. Further, SI Shailender Kumar was suspended by SP, Etah on
16.5.2013. It is further stated that Final Report No. 25 has been submitted
before the appropriate Court of Law in this matter on 24.2.2014. The
magisterial enquiry was conducted by CJM, Etah, UP. The Enquiry Magistrate
examined the relevant records, statements of witnesses and relatives of the
deceased Balveer. Mother, father and wife of the deceased stated before the
Enquiry Magistrate that Balveer was a T.B. patient before admission in the
Jail. He was taking medicines from Agra for the disease. One day he fell down
from a tractor. He died due to illness. Further, the sister-in-law of the
deceased has alleged that Balveer died due to police beating. She has alleged
that Mr. Pandey, one ‘Daroga’ had beaten Balveer. The Jail doctor has stated
before the Enquiry Magistrate that there were two injuries on the buttock of
Balveer (one 7x2 cms and second 1.5x2 cms) and these injuries were 2-3 days
old. There were burn injuries on the anal region of the deceased. The Enquiry
Magistrate concluded that no foul play was suspected in the death of the
deceased. He died a natural death of Septicaemic shock due to chronic lung
and kidney disease. The Commission perused the record and observed that as
per Health Screening Report at the time of admission to the Jail, Balveer
(the deceased) was having multiple scabbed abrasion and burn injuries around
anus. The Post-Mortem Examination Report though stated that there were no
ante mortem injury, but, it has indicated that there was clotted blood on the
nose and mouth of the deceased. Further, the Jail doctor also stated that the
deceased had injuries at the time of admission to the Jail which were 2-3
days old. This creates suspicion that the deceased sustained these injuries
in the police custody. In this regard the police inquired the matter and a
case vide Crime No. 129/13 u/s 326/331 IPC, PS Awagarh was registered against
SI Shailender Kumar, Home Guard Nirmal Kumar and one other Home Guard.
However, FR No. 25 dated 24.2.2014 has been filed before the Court. The
Commission further observed that as per the family members of the deceased,
he was suffering from T.B. before admission to the Jail but from record it is
clear that no treatment for tuberculosis was given to him during his jail
term. Further, as per the doctors of KGMC, Lucknow, the cause of death of the
deceased Balveer was opined to be “blunt injury chest, abdomen and wound in
perineal region and cardio respiratory failure”. Whereas the Post-Mortem
Examination Report reveals no ante mortem injury on the body of the deceased.
Further, the video CD of Post-Mortem Examination of the deceased reveals burn
injury on the right knee, both buttock and perineal region. The right cheek
was having a cut mark injury. Due to these stark inconsistencies, the
Commission is of the view that cause of death given in the Post-Mortem
Examination Report is not reliable. Further, the treatment records of the
deceased corroborated the allegation of torture before admission in the Jail
and there is strong possibility that the deceased was kept in the illegal
confinement before he was arrested by the police on 24.4.2014 and the torture
prima facie appears to have been inflicted upon him during his illegal
confinement. In a grave case like murder for which the deceased was arrested,
the police did not seek or get police remand. This indicates that the
deceased had been kept in illegal confinement by the police and had already
been interrogated. Further, in view of the seriousness of the injuries
inflicted on him in custody, police did not want to take him in custody. The
extent and nature of injuries are such that it strongly suggests that the
deceased was tortured over a few days. Since this is a case of custodial
death, therefore, the file be placed before the Division Bench for
consideration.
|
|
Status : Action
Taken On 12/09/2017
|
|
Action Due Date: 18/11/2017
|
2 Lakh has been paid to NoK of the deceased victim and departmental action has also been taken against 3 delinquent Electricity Department personnel.
---------- Forwarded
message ---------
From: <minority.pvchr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:48 PM
Subject: Fwd: उत्तर प्रदेश के वाराणसी जिले के नगवा क्षेत्र में विधुत विभाग की लापरवाही से करेंट लगने से युवक की हुई मौत के लिए मुआवजा के सन्दर्भ में
To: upendra <pvchr.adv@gmail.com>, pvchr.india <pvchr.india@gmail.com>, Dr. Lenin Raghuvanshi <lenin@pvchr.asia>, shabana <shabana@pvchr.asia>
From: <minority.pvchr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:48 PM
Subject: Fwd: उत्तर प्रदेश के वाराणसी जिले के नगवा क्षेत्र में विधुत विभाग की लापरवाही से करेंट लगने से युवक की हुई मौत के लिए मुआवजा के सन्दर्भ में
To: upendra <pvchr.adv@gmail.com>, pvchr.india <pvchr.india@gmail.com>, Dr. Lenin Raghuvanshi <lenin@pvchr.asia>, shabana <shabana@pvchr.asia>
|
Case
Details of File Number: 32927/24/72/2016
|
|
Diary No: 145824/CR/2016
|
|
Name of the Complainant: DR. LENIN RAGHUVANSHI, CEO
|
|
Complainant Address: MANAVADHIKAR JAN NIGRANI SAMITI,
C-4/2 A, DAULATPUR,
|
|
Name of the Victim: SHIV KUMAR
|
|
Place of Incident: NAGWAN
|
|
Date of Incident: 25/08/2016
|
|
Action Taken:
The complainant alleges that victim died due to
electrocution because of negligence of officials of Electricity Department.
No action has been taken against the culprits and no compensation has been
provided to Nok of deceased victim. The complainant seeks intervention of the
Commission in the matter. Vide last proceedings dated 05.11.2018, the
Commission had observed that already a compensation of Rs. 2 Lakh has been
paid to NoK of the deceased victim and departmental action has also been
taken against 3 delinquent Electricity Department personnel. However no
report has been received from SSP Varanasi regarding the criminal case
registered in the matter. Hence Commission had issued the notice to SSP
Varanasi for sending the details of legal action taken in the matter; further
copy of report was sent to the complainant for comments. In response SSP
Varanasi vide report dated 31.12.2018 has inform the Commission that in the
matter no criminal case has been registered, as wife of victim stated in
writing that she don’t want any legal action. The Commission has considered
the material placed on record. The case is closed, inform the complainant
accordingly.
|
|
Status : Action Taken On 16/05/2019
|
|
Action Due Date: 22/05/2019
|
---------- Forwarded
message ---------
From <minority.pvchr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:49 AM
Subject: उत्तर प्रदेश के वाराणसी जिले के नगवा क्षेत्र में विधुत विभाग की लापरवाही से करेंट लगने से युवक की हुई मौत के लिए मुआवजा के सन्दर्भ में
To: covdnhrc <covdnhrc@nic.in>, ionhrc <ionhrc@nic.in>, jrlawnhrc <jrlawnhrc@hub.nic.in>, Section Officer SB-2 NHRC <so7.nhrc@nic.in>, <registrar-nhrc@nic.in>
Cc: Lenin Raghuvanshi <pvchr.india@gmail.com>, Dr. Lenin Raghuvanshi <lenin@pvchr.asia>
From <minority.pvchr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:49 AM
Subject: उत्तर प्रदेश के वाराणसी जिले के नगवा क्षेत्र में विधुत विभाग की लापरवाही से करेंट लगने से युवक की हुई मौत के लिए मुआवजा के सन्दर्भ में
To: covdnhrc <covdnhrc@nic.in>, ionhrc <ionhrc@nic.in>, jrlawnhrc <jrlawnhrc@hub.nic.in>, Section Officer SB-2 NHRC <so7.nhrc@nic.in>, <registrar-nhrc@nic.in>
Cc: Lenin Raghuvanshi <pvchr.india@gmail.com>, Dr. Lenin Raghuvanshi <lenin@pvchr.asia>
सेवा में, 29 अगस्त, 2016
श्रीमान अध्यक्ष महोदय,
राष्ट्रीय मानवाधिकार
आयोग,
नई दिल्ली |
विषय : उत्तर प्रदेश के
वाराणसी जिले के नगवा क्षेत्र में विधुत विभाग की लापरवाही से करेंट लगने से युवक
की हुई मौत के लिए मुआवजा के सन्दर्भ में |
महोदय,
आपका ध्यान 25 अगस्त, 2016 के दैनिक समाचार पत्र “अमर उजाला” के इस खबर “पानी
में करेंट उतारा, युवक की मौत” की ओर
आकृष्ट कराना चाहता हूँ | उत्तर प्रदेश के वाराणसी जिले के
नगवा क्षेत्र के निवासी शिवकुमार की मौत बिजली के जर्जर तार के टूटने से करेंट
लगने से हो गयी |
अतः आपसे अनुरोध है कि कृपया मृतक के परिवार के जीवन यापन व मृतक की
आकस्मिक मौत के लिए उनके परिजनों को एक लाख रुपये (रुपये 100000/-) मुआवजा दिलाने
की कृपा करे |
संलग्नक :
1. 25 अगस्त, 2016 के अमर उजाला अखबर में
प्रकाशित खबर की प्रति |
भवदीय
डा0 लेनिन रघुवंशी
सीईओ
मानवाधिकार जननिगरानी
समिति
सा 4/2 ए दौलतपुर, वाराणसी
+91-9935599333
Email: minority.pvchr@gmail.com
Website: www.pvchr.asia
Blog: www.pvchr.net, www.testimonialtherapy.org
Website: www.pvchr.asia
Blog: www.pvchr.net, www.testimonialtherapy.org
Wednesday, February 13, 2019
Faking encounter? Noida cop shoots at gym trainer
---------- Forwarded message
---------
From: PVCHR Communication <cfr.pvchr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:49 AM
Subject: Faking encounter? Noida cop shoots at gym trainer
To: <cr.nhrc@nic.in>, covdnhrc <covdnhrc@nic.in>
Cc: lenin <lenin@pvchr.asia>
From: PVCHR Communication <cfr.pvchr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:49 AM
Subject: Faking encounter? Noida cop shoots at gym trainer
To: <cr.nhrc@nic.in>, covdnhrc <covdnhrc@nic.in>
Cc: lenin <lenin@pvchr.asia>
To,
The
Chairperson
National
Human Rights Commission
New Delhi
Dear Sir,
I want to bring in
your kind attention towards the news published Times of India newspaper on 5th
February, 2018 regarding Faking encounter? Noida cop shoots at gym trainer https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/faking-encounter-noida-cop-shoots-at-gym-trainer/articleshow/62782434.cms
Therefore
it is kind request
1. To conduct an inquiry in this
incident under section 176(1)A Cr.PC by a Judicial Magistrate
Thanking
You
Sincerely Yours
Sincerely Yours
Lenin
Raghuvanshi
Founder
and CEO
Peoples'
Vigilance Committee on Human Rights
Email:
pvchr.india@gmail.com
Faking
encounter? Noida cop shoots at gym trainer
TNN | Updated: Feb 5, 2018, 04:59 IST

3
HIGHLIGHTS
·
A
25-year-old gym traineron Saturday was shot at by a sub-inspector after an
argument.
·
The cop,
Vijay Darshan, was arrested on Sunday and three others suspended.
·
The
victim, Jitendra Yadav, is battling for life in hospital.
·
Noida
police denied receiving any message about an encounter on its wireless
frequency from Darshan.
NOIDA: In the middle of an outbreak of police encounters
across Uttar
Pradesh — 22 in the past four days — a 25-year-old gym trainer
who had stopped for a pizza at a roadside outlet in Noida on Saturday night was
shot and critically injured by a sub-inspector after an argument.
The cop, Vijay Darshan, was arrested on Sunday and three others suspended. The victim, Jitendra Yadav, is battling for life in hospital.
Four eyewitnesses to the "unprovoked" attack — all returning with Jitendra from his cousin's engagement — said the victim was bundled into the backseat of his Scorpio by Darshan, who pulled out his service revolver and fired at his throat in cold blood around 9.30pm. The witnesses said Darshan and another cop, Narendra, drove away in the Scorpio with a bleeding Jitendra.
They arrived with the victim 90 minutes later at Fortis hospital (Sector 62), barely 7km from the shooting scene.
Noida 'encounter' to get out-of-turn promotion?
Jitendra was admitted at Fortis in a critical condition. A doctor said the bullet got lodged in the youth's backbone. "We have performed the surgery.
The patient is in ICU but his condition is critical," the doctor told TOI on Sunday evening. For a police force that has openly stated its intention to fight crime through 'encounters', a line endorsed by the CM himself, the Noida shooting showed how the strategy could blow up in its face. It also confirmed the worst fears, of cops misusing it and treating it as a licence to settle scores.
One of the witnesses to Jitendra's shooting, his friend Gautam Sardar, said Darshan had called someone on his cellphone immediately after firing the shot to say that an encounter had taken place, and remarked to his colleague, Narendra, that the "encounter" would earn him an "out-of-turn promotion".
The cop, Vijay Darshan, was arrested on Sunday and three others suspended. The victim, Jitendra Yadav, is battling for life in hospital.
Four eyewitnesses to the "unprovoked" attack — all returning with Jitendra from his cousin's engagement — said the victim was bundled into the backseat of his Scorpio by Darshan, who pulled out his service revolver and fired at his throat in cold blood around 9.30pm. The witnesses said Darshan and another cop, Narendra, drove away in the Scorpio with a bleeding Jitendra.
They arrived with the victim 90 minutes later at Fortis hospital (Sector 62), barely 7km from the shooting scene.
Noida 'encounter' to get out-of-turn promotion?
Jitendra was admitted at Fortis in a critical condition. A doctor said the bullet got lodged in the youth's backbone. "We have performed the surgery.
The patient is in ICU but his condition is critical," the doctor told TOI on Sunday evening. For a police force that has openly stated its intention to fight crime through 'encounters', a line endorsed by the CM himself, the Noida shooting showed how the strategy could blow up in its face. It also confirmed the worst fears, of cops misusing it and treating it as a licence to settle scores.
One of the witnesses to Jitendra's shooting, his friend Gautam Sardar, said Darshan had called someone on his cellphone immediately after firing the shot to say that an encounter had taken place, and remarked to his colleague, Narendra, that the "encounter" would earn him an "out-of-turn promotion".

The SUV in which the victim,
Jitendra Yadav (inset), was shot at.
Noida police denied receiving any message about an encounter on its wireless frequency from Darshan, a 30-year-old trainee sub-inspector who is from Mathura and has been in the city for just three months.
Officials said they got to know of the episode only when the four people who were with Jitendra — friends Gautam and Suneel Jat, uncle Kripal Yadav and Dharmendra — reported the shooting at Parthala police post.
Police also refused to term the shooting an encounter. At a press conference called on Sunday afternoon under mounting criticism and a huge protest in front of the hospital, Noida SSP Love Kumar said Jitendra's brother Dharmendra, who was also present during the shooting, and Darshan were known to each other.
Though the SSP offered no other information, Jitendra's family members they owned some shops, which they had rented out, in the local market and that cops had visited the shops in January to extort money from traders.
Dharmendra and Jitendra had confronted the cops and refused to pay, they claimed. But Dharmedra had not seen this coming — he claimed he had a "cordial" interaction with Darshan on January 26 when he gave him a lift to the Republic Day parade in Noida.
A case of attempt to murder and robbery (Jitendra's bracelet and gold chain are missing) has been filed against Darshan, who was on Sunday sent to judicial custody. The three other cops — constables Sanjay Tamta and Pankaj Singh and Narendra, also a trainee SI — have been suspended and their role is being investigated. All the cops have been booked under the same charges.
The witnesses told police they had stopped for a pizza while on the way to drop Suneel and Gautam after attending Kripal's daughter Mona's engagement function. Jitendra was driving. A few minutes later, Darshan and the other cops drove up in a police Vitara Brezza.
They were apparently responding to a complaint from the neighbourhood that Jitendra and the others were playing loud music in the Scorpio. Darshan was in plain clothes. "They started thrashing us without reason.
Noida police denied receiving any message about an encounter on its wireless frequency from Darshan, a 30-year-old trainee sub-inspector who is from Mathura and has been in the city for just three months.
Officials said they got to know of the episode only when the four people who were with Jitendra — friends Gautam and Suneel Jat, uncle Kripal Yadav and Dharmendra — reported the shooting at Parthala police post.
Police also refused to term the shooting an encounter. At a press conference called on Sunday afternoon under mounting criticism and a huge protest in front of the hospital, Noida SSP Love Kumar said Jitendra's brother Dharmendra, who was also present during the shooting, and Darshan were known to each other.
Though the SSP offered no other information, Jitendra's family members they owned some shops, which they had rented out, in the local market and that cops had visited the shops in January to extort money from traders.
Dharmendra and Jitendra had confronted the cops and refused to pay, they claimed. But Dharmedra had not seen this coming — he claimed he had a "cordial" interaction with Darshan on January 26 when he gave him a lift to the Republic Day parade in Noida.
A case of attempt to murder and robbery (Jitendra's bracelet and gold chain are missing) has been filed against Darshan, who was on Sunday sent to judicial custody. The three other cops — constables Sanjay Tamta and Pankaj Singh and Narendra, also a trainee SI — have been suspended and their role is being investigated. All the cops have been booked under the same charges.
The witnesses told police they had stopped for a pizza while on the way to drop Suneel and Gautam after attending Kripal's daughter Mona's engagement function. Jitendra was driving. A few minutes later, Darshan and the other cops drove up in a police Vitara Brezza.
They were apparently responding to a complaint from the neighbourhood that Jitendra and the others were playing loud music in the Scorpio. Darshan was in plain clothes. "They started thrashing us without reason.
Recommended By Colombia
Darshan forced Jitendra to leave the steering and take the back seat," Dharmendra said. Darshan then took the driving seat while Narendra sat in the rear.
Jitendra protested, and that angered Darshan. "Darshan took out a revolver and thought for a moment. He then loaded it, turned back, and shot Jitendra from pointblank range," said Gautam.
TOP COMMENT
Great work is being done by Modi and Yogi.. As they are
expert in killing innicents.. Shame on such a govt.Zulfiquar Ahmed Khan
Suneel said he was in the back seat when Darshan shot Jitendra, and the cops had centrally locked the doors of the SUV to ensure no one escaped. He said he smashed a window pane to escape. At the press conference, Love Kumar said, "No wireless message was flashed about the encounter. Other police personnel informed us that sub-inspector Darshan had shot a person. We have seized his licenced pistol."
Noida MLA Pankaj Singh, and MP and Union minister Mahesh Sharma also visited the hospital and said a fair probe would be carried out into the shooting.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)